Magaya vs Fresa: which freight forwarding software should you choose?
Author:
Priyanka
Published On:
1 min read

Quick answer: Magaya or Fresa?
Mostly it splits two ways: by geography, and by how much warehousing you do. Magaya is the established North American platform, and its warehouse management is genuinely strong. Fresa, built by Fresa Technologies, is a freight-forwarding ERP with deep roots across the Middle East, India, and wider Asia.
Choose Magaya if you are a US or North American forwarder, 3PL, or customs broker that runs real warehouse operations and needs US customs filing in one system.
Choose Fresa if you run a small-to-mid forwarding or NVOCC operation in the Middle East, India, or Asia and want an affordable, well-supported ERP tuned to local customs and statutory rules.
Choose CargoEZ if you want one modern freight forwarding software that runs the whole workflow, from enquiry and rate comparison to quote, booking, shipment, billing, and profitability, with a native accounting ledger. It is the third option we compare below.
Jump to what you need
Magaya vs Fresa at a glance
Magaya | Fresa | |
Best for | US and North American mid-market forwarders, 3PLs, customs brokers | Small-to-mid forwarders and NVOCCs in the Middle East, India, and Asia |
Backing | Magaya, US-based (Miami), established 2001; WMS deepened by the Catapult acquisition | Fresa Technologies, offices in Singapore, Dubai, and India; customers in 60+ countries |
Standout strength | Built-in warehouse management, rate management, US customs | Freight-forwarding workflow, regional customs and statutory compliance, support |
Pricing model | Module-based (core plus WMS, accounting, add-ons), mid-tier | Low entry price, flat-rate or custom by product (Fresa Gold, Fresa XPress) |
Implementation | About 8 to 12 weeks | Fast, built for small teams |
G2 rating | 4.4 / 5 (G2) | Strongly reviewed; multiple 2025 Asia, EMEA, and India regional-leader badges (G2) |
Capterra rating | 4.4 / 5 (51 reviews) (Capterra) | 4.8 / 5 (164 reviews, Fresa XPress) (Capterra) |
Ease of use | 4.5 / 5 on Capterra | 4.8 / 5 on Capterra |
Main limitation | Cost climbs as you add modules; North America focus | Strongest in its home regions; reviewers note slowdowns on large data volumes |
Ratings verified on Capterra and G2, September 2026. Both vendors price by custom quote or by product tier, so the pricing row describes the model, not a single published number. One caveat on the scores: Fresa's headline Capterra number is for Fresa XPress, and the company also sells Fresa Gold and Fresa Global.
A third modern option: CargoEZ is a US all-in-one that runs the whole forwarding workflow, from enquiry to profitability, in one system, with a native accounting ledger and a light warehouse module. Compare it in CargoEZ vs Magaya or book a demo.
Where each one fits: North America or the Middle East and Asia?
Magaya is a North American mainstay. It serves US and Canadian forwarders, 3PLs, NVOCCs, couriers, and customs brokers, and its reviewer base skews heavily to small and mid-sized US logistics companies (gofreight.com). If your lanes run through US ports and you file US customs, Magaya sits close to home.
Fresa comes at the market from the other side of the world. Fresa Technologies operates from Singapore, Dubai, and India, says it has freight-forwarding customers in 60-plus countries, and builds its compliance around regional rules like India's GST, the UAE's VAT, and EGM/IGM customs EDI (fresatechnologies.com). Its verified reviews skew toward India-based users (Software Advice).
So the split is mostly geographic. North American operations lean Magaya, while forwarders in the Middle East, India, and Asia lean Fresa. Your ports, your filing jurisdictions, and where your support hours land decide most of it.
Whose warehouse and WMS runs deeper, Magaya or Fresa?
Aspect | Magaya | Fresa |
Warehouse management | Built-in WMS, deepened by Catapult | Freight execution first; lighter warehouse |
WMS features | Receiving, put-away, picking, packing, shipping, inventory, billing | Documentation and shipment focus |
Mobile | Flow WMS app, Magaya Dimensioner | Cloud, web-accessible |
If warehousing matters, Magaya is the clear pick. Its built-in WMS covers receiving, put-away, picking, packing, shipping, inventory, and warehouse billing, and the Catapult acquisition strengthened it further (Magaya). For a forwarder that also runs a bonded or contract warehouse, that depth is a real reason to choose it.
Fresa centers on freight-forwarding execution, quotation, documentation, BL generation, and shipment tracking, rather than heavy warehousing (Software Advice). For a forwarding-led operation with little inventory work, that focus is fine. But if the warehouse is core to your business, Magaya goes deeper.
Whose customs e-filing matches your lanes, Magaya or Fresa?
Aspect | Magaya | Fresa |
US customs | ACE-certified ABI, AMS, ISF, Entry Type 86 | Not a focus |
Regional customs | North America focus | India EGM/IGM, UAE customs EDI |
Statutory tax | US-oriented | GST (India), VAT (UAE), TDS |
This one comes down entirely to where you file. Magaya offers an ACE-certified ABI customs solution with AMS, ISF, and Entry Type 86 handling for low-value shipments, which fits US import and export work (Magaya). For a US customs broker, that native filing is a major convenience.
Fresa, by contrast, builds its compliance around its home markets, with EGM and IGM customs EDI for Indian and UAE customs and statutory coverage for GST, VAT, and TDS (fresatechnologies.com). For a forwarder in those regions, that local depth is exactly what you want. There is no single winner here. The right choice is simply the one that already speaks your customs authority's language.
Magaya vs Fresa on accounting and job profitability
Aspect | Magaya | Fresa |
Accounting | Accounting module and integrations | Built-in accounting module |
Job profitability | Yes | Job profitability reporting |
Statutory support | US-oriented | GST, VAT, TDS built in |
Both platforms handle the money side, not just the freight. Magaya offers accounting features and accounting integrations alongside its operations tools, so invoicing and reporting live near the shipment record (Capterra).
Fresa ships an accounting module designed for the shipping community, covering trade and non-trade transactions plus statutory requirements. Its job-profitability reporting is a feature reviewers single out as a strength, though some note that reports can slow down on very large data sets (Capterra). For regional statutory finance, Fresa is purpose-built; for US-centric books tied to warehouse billing, Magaya keeps it in one place.
How Magaya and Fresa price and roll out
Aspect | Magaya | Fresa |
Pricing model | Module-based, mid-tier | Low entry, flat-rate or custom |
Implementation | About 8 to 12 weeks | Fast, small-team oriented |
Ease of use | 4.5 / 5 on Capterra | 4.8 / 5 on Capterra |
Neither vendor publishes a firm public price, so treat any single figure as an estimate. Magaya uses module-based pricing, a core license plus add-ons for WMS, accounting, and advanced features, which lands it in the mid-tier and means cost grows as you turn modules on; implementation is commonly reported at roughly 8 to 12 weeks with separate setup fees (getapp.com).
Fresa positions on affordability and speed, with entry pricing that listings put on the low end and a product line (Fresa XPress for smaller teams, Fresa Gold for fuller ERP) aimed at lean operations (Software Advice). Reviewers rate it slightly higher on ease of use, 4.8 versus 4.5 on Capterra. For a small team on a tight budget, Fresa is usually lighter to buy and adopt; for a mid-market North American operation that needs the warehouse and customs depth, Magaya's heavier fit-out earns its keep. Confirm current pricing with each vendor.
What real users say about Magaya and Fresa
Magaya holds 4.4 / 5 on Capterra (51 reviews), with ease of use at 4.5 and customer service at 4.3 (Capterra), and 4.4 / 5 on G2 (G2). Fresa XPress holds 4.8 / 5 on Capterra (164 reviews), with ease of use and customer service both at 4.8 (Capterra), and Fresa Gold has picked up 2025 regional-leader badges for Asia, EMEA, and India on G2 (G2).
Magaya: "I love how easy you can find things and how fast you can filter data." (Camilo F., Logistics Coordinator, via Capterra)
Fresa: "Fresa is a user-friendly and comprehensive logistics ERP solution that helps streamline freight forwarding operations." (Yoonus Y., Accountant, via Capterra)
Fresa con: "The system may become slow when handling large volumes of data, especially in reports like job profitability." (Siva S., Manager, via Capterra)
The pattern is clear. Fresa scores higher, earning praise for ease of use and support across its home regions, with performance on heavy data its recurring gripe. Magaya is the trusted North American workhorse, strongest where warehouse and US customs meet.
Magaya or Fresa: which should you pick?
Choose Magaya if you are a US or North American forwarder, 3PL, or customs broker that runs meaningful warehouse operations and wants built-in US customs filing, and you can fund a module-based, mid-tier rollout.
Choose Fresa if you run a small-to-mid forwarding or NVOCC operation in the Middle East, India, or Asia, want strong local customs and statutory compliance, and value an affordable, easy-to-adopt, well-supported ERP.
For most teams, this is a regional and warehouse-depth decision more than a feature scorecard. Match the platform to your ports, your filing jurisdictions, and how much warehousing you actually do.
A third option worth a look: CargoEZ
Magaya and Fresa are not the only modern choices. CargoEZ is a web-native, all-in-one freight forwarding software built for US small and mid-sized forwarders, worth adding to a shortlist alongside them, especially if you sit between Magaya's warehouse-heavy build and Fresa's regional focus.
CargoEZ runs the entire forwarding lifecycle in one platform: enquiry, rate request, rate comparison, quote, approval, booking, shipment, exception handling, customer updates, billing, and profitability. It ships a native accounting general ledger and chart of accounts, a light warehouse module, and US AMS and ISF filing. There is no per-shipment fee across four billing cadences, and it typically goes live in under a month. Reviews are strong, at 4.8 / 5 on G2 (G2).
Here is how the three compare:
Magaya | Fresa | CargoEZ | |
Best for | North American mid-market, warehouse-heavy | Middle East, India, Asia SMB forwarders | US SMB and mid-market all-in-one |
Standout | Built-in WMS, US customs | Regional customs, low cost, support | Full lifecycle, native accounting ledger |
Pricing | Module-based, mid-tier | Low entry, custom | Custom, no per-shipment fee |
Implementation | About 8 to 12 weeks | Fast | Under 1 month |
Rating | Capterra 4.4 (51) | Capterra 4.8 (164, XPress) | G2 4.8 (~40) |
See how it stacks up, or book a CargoEZ demo or call +1 (408) 834-7476.
Our take
Magaya and Fresa solve the same job from two different corners of the map. Magaya is the North American workhorse, the pick for forwarders and brokers that need real warehouse management and US customs filing in one platform. Fresa is the regional specialist, an affordable, well-supported ERP for forwarders across the Middle East, India, and Asia, with strong local compliance built in.
Pick by geography and warehouse depth first, then by budget and ease of adoption. And if you are a US small or mid-sized forwarder weighing both, CargoEZ is a comparable modern freight forwarding ERP software worth putting on the same shortlist, especially if you want a native accounting ledger without a heavy rollout.
Compare CargoEZ directly, book a demo, or call +1 (408) 834-7476.
Frequently asked questions
1. Is Magaya good for small freight forwarders?
Yes. Magaya serves small and mid-sized US logistics businesses first, with the large majority of its reviewers coming from small companies, and it covers quotation, shipment tracking, bills of lading, invoicing, and inventory in one place (gofreight.com). Small forwarders that also run a warehouse tend to get the most out of it.
2. What is Fresa software?
Fresa is a freight-forwarding ERP from Fresa Technologies, a logistics-only software company with offices in Singapore, Dubai, and India. Its products, including Fresa Gold and the lighter Fresa XPress, handle quotations, documentation, BL generation, invoicing, and compliance for forwarders, NVOCCs, and IATA cargo agents in 60-plus countries (fresatechnologies.com).
3. How much does Magaya cost?
Magaya does not publish a fixed price. It uses module-based pricing, a core license plus add-ons for WMS, accounting, and advanced features, which puts it in the mid-tier, with implementation fees usually separate (getapp.com). Get a quote scoped to your users and modules. Fresa generally starts lower and is aimed at smaller teams.
4. Does Magaya have warehouse management?
Yes, and it is one of its strengths. Magaya's built-in WMS handles receiving, put-away, picking, packing, shipping, inventory, and warehouse billing, and it was strengthened by the Catapult acquisition (Magaya). Fresa's warehouse capabilities are lighter and more freight-execution focused.
5. What countries does Fresa serve?
Fresa Technologies says it has freight-forwarding customers in more than 60 countries, and it is strongest across the Middle East, India, and wider Asia, with built-in support for regional rules like India's GST, the UAE's VAT, and EGM/IGM customs EDI (fresatechnologies.com).
6. What is a modern alternative to Magaya and Fresa?
For a US small or mid-sized forwarder, CargoEZ ranks among the modern Magaya alternatives worth a shortlist look. It runs the full lifecycle from enquiry to profitability in one system, adds a native accounting ledger and a light warehouse module, charges no per-shipment fee, and goes live in under a month (book a demo).
Don't forget to share this blog!


